I know this was published a couple of days ago, but I think I was in so much shock that I didn't really believe the story until today. 

Darrell… are you kidding me?

Even if you did trademark the word 'Boogity' or even the phrase 'Boogity, Boogity Boogity', you have no legs to stand on in this case (in my opinion) as the man's business was named in 2002 and your trademark didn't get registered until 2005! 

And I must agree with our new friend Randy Nicholson, for you to feel somewhat threatened by the small merchandise business of this man in Canada, and for you to believe that he may be taking money or interest away from a part of your likeness, it's just plain asinine.  But thanks to you, he has had to invest thousands of dollars to make changes. If you would have just let it be, you could have prevented him from wasting additional monies in this dire economy.  Are you helping him pay for the changes that are brought on just to make you happy? Didn't think so.

What you should have done to avoid this mess in the first place, was register for a trademark back in 2002… it's the 3 year gap that is making your case questionable.

Now, do the right thing, DW, and pay the man his unnecessary change fees and then moving forward, let anything else go that may arise within the time frame of 2002 – 2005.

For the articles I am referring to, regarding NASCAR's Darrell Waltrip vs. Randy Nicholson, click HERE

CrashG@SpeedFreaks.TV